Emissions
Lower Carbon
In an amine unit most of the carbon footprint sits behind the reboiler steam. Cut the steam and you cut the emissions of the boiler that raises it. The platform turns each saving into tonnes of CO₂ and money, with the assumptions on the table.
Case studySteady-state potential, not a certified reduction. Assumes 8,000 h a year, boiler efficiency 0.85, 56.1 kg CO₂ per GJ and USD 18 per tonne of steam.
Most roadmaps start with a target and work backwards. This one starts with the steam already being wasted in your own operating history, priced and linked to a named fault. Ranked over time, that is an abatement list with costs attached.
The figures above use a stated, typical boiler factor. Your honest factor depends on how your utilities are fired, so the platform shows the steam saved and lets you apply your own site factor.
A CO₂ capture plant uses the same absorber and stripper loop, and the regeneration steam is its largest operating cost. There, every tonne of steam saved is a direct gain in net capture efficiency.
Amine you did not have to buy and waste you did not have to dispose of belong in the same plan. The platform prices solvent life and amine losses alongside the steam.
The tools that do it
What this is not
See the steam, cost and CO₂ behind each recommended setting on real plant data.
Request a demo